My favorite part of Dimensions is seeing all the entries laid out before the jurying begins. It is amazing, beautiful and entirely overwhelming. As you may know, the jurors carried the responsibility of choosing only 35 works out of all those submitted. This year there were exactly 202 pieces entered for the jurors’ consideration. I kept this in mind as I did my first loop around the room and found myself feeling rather sorry for them. Not just because there were so many entries – mostly because so many of the entries were so incredibly exquisite. How, I thought, would they manage to whittle their selection down to only 35?
Dimensions Jurors Michael Hosaluk and Susan Rankin at the Public Critique in April |
Prior to the jurors’ selection, I filled out the “Choose Your own Dimensions” form along with dozens of other SCC members and the general public during the open house. I wasn’t looking at the work with the same set of eyes required by a juror or to bear that awesome responsibility. I was free to choose based on my personal taste/aesthetic and have fun.
Of course, the SCC doesn’t do this exercise just for fun. We’ve taken all the information collected from all the “Choose Your Own Dimensions” forms, to discover what Dimensions might have looked like if the jurying were up to you!
First of all, the public version of Dimensions would only have 24 pieces of artwork. This is because after the first 24, the votes for the rest were too scattered to determine the remainder of the show. Votes for the last 11 spots were evenly distributed over 40 pieces!
Left: Leopard's Last Leap (photo courtesy of the artist) Right: Cornucopia (photo courtesy of Grant Kernan, AK Photos) |
The public and the jurors agreed on 7 pieces in total (all photos below courtesy of AK Photos)
Mel Bolen Evidence |
Monique Martin & Cathryn Miller The Legend of the Red Thread |
Deborah Potter Little Deer |
Anita Rocamora Last Headlight |
Jaime Russell Rocking Cormorant |
Paula Cooley Undulatio |
Gary Greer The Duke of Earl |
As for my choices, I won’t tell you which ones, but 9 out of the 35 I
voted on made it into the final show! How many of your choices made it in? How
do you feel about the choices the jurors made?
Amanda, thank you very much for the taste of dimensions 2013 article which you've provided here. I am slightly disappointed again, however, to see the repeated repetition of ideas which I have already seen before.
ReplyDeleteIt would be great if we could publicly address the large fact that despite the rhetoric, the SCC in general, and Dimensions in particular does NOT actually represent the finest of fine craft made in this province today. I believe the SCC is demonstrably restrictive and intentionally painting a false picture. Rigorous attachment to two key words; 'excellence' and 'fine' are ruthlessly pumped and jammed into our collective consciousness. I simply wonder why
ReplyDelete